Aller au contenu
en Se connecter
0.0 Non notée

CVE-2026-3479 DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same…

Description

DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.

Produits et versions touchés

Produit Versions touchées Corrigé en
CPython 3.15 3.15.0a1 → < 3.15.0a8 3.15.0a8
CPython 3.14 3.14.0 → < 3.14.4 3.14.4
CPython 3.13 premières → < 3.13.13 3.13.13

Références

Chronologie

  1. Publiée
  2. Dernière modification

Autres CVE de CPython

Les 79 CVE de CPython →
CVE-2026-116566 socket.getaddrinfo() previously accepted null bytes within *host* and *port* parameters which can cause the values to be… 5.3 Moyenne CVE-2026-103995 Lenient parsing of integers for response body and chunk framing 2.0 Faible CVE-2026-115557 Python has added a denylist for known compromised certificates to the "ssl" module to ensure user safety even without… 9.4 Critique CVE-2026-114583 tarfile.tar_filter could be bypassed using crafted link entries, including symlinks with empty or directory-like… 6.9 Moyenne
Suivre cette CVE